2016 heralds the new Olympic games! Check out the upset--Chicago gets beat out by the winner Rio de Janeiro. What about the opinions? Yahoo, reported the news with Chicago depressed. CNN has more of a reporter view, maybe? How did this story get your attention? Check out these sites and see which one is most appealing to you!
CNN
Yahoo
MSNBC
Not only that, but how does this news affect the news and approval of President Obama worldwide and locally? Maybe some news stories will come from this too.

3 comments:
I would definitely say the yahoo story. It gives more facts while remaining appealing. Also syntactically, it makes the story for the bid for the Olympics like a competition, which is fun considering that's what the Olympic games are.
The win for Rio de Janeiro against what seemed insurmoutable odds made yahoo's story by far the more entertaining. It was refreshing to see that it was full of facts rather than oppionion like we see in so many news stories.MSNBC's take was prettty cool seeing on how they focused more on chicago not getting the olympics rather than Rio getting them. Yahoo is by far my personal favorie.
Yahoo and MSNBC seemed more on he side of Chicago, while CNN focused more on Rio. Personally, I think it's great that the Olympics will be held in Rio! So CNN was my favorite. They took more of a 'Hey, Rio won, so let's talk about them!' view rather than the 'oh dang, Obama didn't get Chicago to win the thing.' Yahoo was a little more entertaining to read, but that's typical of Yahoo writing style. :) good articles, but CNN was my fav.
Post a Comment